- 5d mark iii vs 6d mark ii performance manual#
- 5d mark iii vs 6d mark ii performance upgrade#
- 5d mark iii vs 6d mark ii performance iso#
5d mark iii vs 6d mark ii performance manual#
One-Shot AF, Predictive AI Servo AF, AI Focus AF, Manual focus
They will be updated as soon as possible. Hi-Speed USB, HDMI mini output, Video output (PAL/ NTSC), Headphone mini jackĬertain fields may be left blank. Selectable Blue/Amber bias or Magenta/ Green bias. Single, Continuous L, Continuous H, Self-timer (2s+remote, 10s+remote), Silent single shooting, Silent continuous shootingĬF card type I (UDMA compatible), SD, SDHC, SDXC But even here you talking close to $2900. Answer: The 5D MkII is quite an old camera, and although it was considered a standard for DSLR filmmakers because of its full-frame sensor and ability to use Canon’s best lenses, the crop sensor 7D was also quite popular. So if 5dmk2 was like $1000 then I agree pick 5dmk2 but with what they selling 6d for, I would pick 6d. Here used 5dmk will sell for like $1300-$1400 while you can get brand new 6d for $1300. We and our partners use cookies to give you the best online experience, including to personalise advertising and content. Or you can get a quality ND filter, and make stunning long exposure shots, at daylight - without that filter, no matter wich camera is better, you can't make these shots. Comparison of Canon EOS 5D Mark III and Canon EOS 6D Mark II based on specifications, reviews and ratings.
5d mark iii vs 6d mark ii performance iso#
Now its nice that the 6D has better HIGH ISO performance, but without that Tripod, it does not really matter, because you won't shoot night pictures at 1/20sec, but at 30s, and for that you NEED a tripod, or something that holds your camera. Its the photograper, and his (rest) gear that makes that difference.įor example, for that $500 you could get a nice tripod, and use it to make nice night shots. In all honesty, comparing camera specs side by side does not make that much difference. The question is: Is the 6D that much better for your needs, that is it worth the $500 extra, or can you get something for the 5D Mk II for $500, that makes it a better deal. This megapixels advantage translates into a 5 percent gain in linear resolution. Now if you can't afford the 5D Mk III, and looking at the prizes, the 5D Mk II should be around $2100, and the 6D around $2600. While the two cameras under review share the same sensor size, the 5D Mark III offers a higher resolution of 22.1 megapixels, compared with 20 MP of the 6D. If you really want to feel like upgrading, then the 5D Mk III is the only way to go, it is the only (not 1 Series) camera realy superior to the 7D. If you are coming from a 7D tough, the AF system of both these cameras is worse then that of the 7D.ĪND THAT could make you being disappointed. The 6D is a good camera for sure, but (as my friend also said) its not that better, that its wort to "upgrade".
5d mark iii vs 6d mark ii performance upgrade#
My 5D Mk II makes me perfectly happy, the only thing I would upgrade to is the MK III.
Sure the 24-70 is newer, more recent technology, but is it really better?!
0 kommentar(er)
